Mr. Francisco Rodriguez Guardado Case

On June 2nd, the UA Officers were approached by the MIT Student Activist Coalition about the deportation case of Mr. Francisco Rodriguez Guardado, who has worked as a janitor at MIT for over five years.  More specific details of his case can be found below.

The MIT Student Activist Coalition requested the UA’s support for three things:

  1. Sign this MIT-specific petition:

  2. Sign this non-MIT specific petition:

  3. Write a letter of support to ICE for Mr. Rodriguez. 

The UA Policy Platform states under International Student Issues that it firmly supports:

20. The right of international students to study at MIT and participate in the same extracurricular, educational, training, and on-campus employment opportunities during their studies that are available to domestic students.

21. Efforts that allow undocumented students to study at MIT unhindered.

Although Mr. Rodriguez is not an undergraduate student, he is a member of our community and it is important for us to support all of those members. Moreover, it is not unreasonable to believe issues like these may begin to affect undergraduates and we should be proactive about addressing them.

On June 12th, the UA Council voted 13 in favor, 0 against, and 3 abstain through out-of-session voting procedures for each of those three things. As a result, the UA Council signed both petitions and sent out a letter of support to Mr. Rodriguez's immigration lawyer. The full text of the letter can be found here

On June 13th, Mr. Rodriguez will have his check-in. If he is detained, there will be a press conference in front of the JFK Federal Building at 2pm, with a contingent of students leaving the Kendall T-stop at 1:30pm. 

Support Senior House


Welcome to the new website! Next year you will see posts on what your student leaders in the Undergraduate Association are thinking about. As always, please let us know how we can better serve you in the comments. 

Senior House

A number of thoughtful, in-depth posts from across campus have been written regarding the recent announcement regarding Senior House, analyzing the data, noting that Senior House has a significant percentage of LGBTQ, low-income, and URM students, critiquing the lack of communication, and celebrating the importance of Senior House culture. If you feel overwhelmed and don't know where to begin to join in on the conversation, these pieces capture the essence of the issue. (Please feel free to comment below with additional links, which I will add to this list.)

Alongside Senior House President Sarah Melvin, I invite you to join the conversation.

It is troubling to see administrators make decisions without the engagement of students.

I ask you, if you are affiliated with an affinity group, be it one that represents your race, your sexuality, your ethnicity, if you are a recipient of financial aid, if you are from a low-income family, if you love your MIT community, if you live in a dorm, if you have lived in a dorm, if you are an MIT Alumnus, if you are an MIT Undergraduate, to brave asking the important questions and to remind MIT's leaders of the importance of open discussions prior to making decisions.

Senior House President Sarah Melvin has asked for the MIT community to show support for Senior House community and emphasize to administrators the necessity of working with students to protect the support systems that exist at MIT. She has released a petition, available here, and a detailed proposal to improve the existing decision. I have already signed the petition, and encourage further discussion on its points. On the website, you also have the option to submit a letter of support. Feel free to reach out to Sarah here: with any questions that you may have on how to show your support.

Within the Undergraduate Association, the Student-Administrator Collaboration Committee will be evaluating the events surrounding the Senior House decision and how to improve communication in the future. If you would like to get involved or have any questions, please contact Chair Lilly Chin at . Furthermore, the Student Support and Wellness Committee is considering ways to improve Mental Health resources. If you would like to get involved, contact . 

Warm wishes,
Sophia Liu
Undergraduate Association President

Sarah Melvin
Senior House President

Kate Farris
Dormitory Council President

Yuge Ji
Dormitory Council Vice President

MIT's tight-knit feel in the early 1900's

[originally to ua-history-interest]

This week in STS.050 we're studying the tenure of President Maclaurin, which is essentially the story of locating, financing, building, and moving to the Cambridge campus. (One of our assignments was to watch a 20-minute short film about the relocation story, which will hopefully be in tomorrow's Byte.)

One thing I'm mystified by is the "intensely loyal" feeling among the student and alumni bodies that's conveyed by all of the documents we read, especially from the decade before when there had been a vociferous campaign by alumni to resist a proposed MIT-Harvard merger. I took a quick look through Institutional Research's public data to see if there was any way I could compare modern student/alum "loyalty" to that of 100 years ago, but I don't think it's an easy question; the best I could find is that since 2002, graduating seniors generally have been getting more and more satisfied with their MIT education each year.

But, like, here are some excerpts. Most of them are from a book by Philip Alexander, which has a chapter for each MIT president.

Excerpt 1. School songs being penned at a breakneck pace. (from a section on people shifting from "Tech" to "M.I.T.")

After that, older school songs - "Tech forever" (1903), "Tech men" (1914), "Technology rag" (1915), "O Institute, Technology!" (1916) - made way for "Alma mater" (1923, with references to both Technology and M.I.T.), "The courts of M.I.T." (1925), and "Hail! M.I.T." (1927). By the late 1920s, the shift was all but complete.

Do any of you know school songs other than the drinking song? I'm sure we have them, but certainly they're not widespread.

Excerpt 3. The President of MIT being an accessible figure.

Maclaurin focused as much attention on social aspects of student life as on the academic side. Students gravitated toward him and his family, just as an earlier generation had felt drawn to the Pritchetts. Alice Maclaurin was an eager surrogate mother, visiting sick beds and hosting many a Saturday-evening get-together at the president's home on Bay State Road, then, as of 1917, at the official residence in Cambridge. These events usually ended with folks gathered around the piano belting out "Take me back to Tech" and other patriotic songs. Students adored Mrs. Maclaurin's style, the way her "glow warmed the hearts of many a weary, homesick freshman, and cheered to better endeavor some lagging upper-class-man." At Christmas the Maclaurins regaled students who could not get home for the holidays with food, drink, gifts, and a special surprise treat - in 1910, for example, a quasi-staged reading of Dickens's A Christmas Carol by professor of English Arlo Bates. Rupert and Colin [President Maclaurin's sons] were every Tech student's little brothers. Two weeks after Colin was born in December 1914, an alumni group presented a silver porringer and spoon underscoring how deeply affection for the family ran.

I think I've heard a story about Killian's daughter acting in a Shakespeare production in Senior House in the 1950's, but nothing of that scale more recently than that.

Excerpt 3. Closeness with faculty.

One compensation for the highly congested conditions that had existed for many years at Boston Tech was the intimacy of contact between students and staff. Students transferring from other colleges, accustomed to meeting professors only in class, frequently commented on the cordial relations they found here. The compact quarters, the fixed curriculum, and the intensive work required had always brought student and teacher together in a way not common in other types of schools, and led to many valuable and lasting associations.

In a later section, it's mentioned that the bursar was known as "Uncle Horace". I'm not making this up.

It's all so ... jolly ....

Certainly the fact that research wasn't so much a priority of MIT at the time would have made a difference, as well as the fact that there were very few grad students, and that even the undergraduate population was about half of what it is today.

But that was largely true of a lot of other schools at the time, too. And the data shows that nowadays, we have worse student-faculty closeness than our "peer institutions". So I wonder what happened.


P.S. President Pritchett, who served in the mid-1900's, went to school in Germany, where they had a tradition called Kommers of social-academic-scholarly-mingling-with-beer. He introduced it at MIT. The students loved it. Many onlookers and Bostonians disapproved.

Also, I keep reading references to smokers. Apparently that was a big thing. Everyone would get together in a room and smoke. There would be "All-Tech Smokers" at important events, and there would be ads for "Freshman Smoker" like we would normally hear about a Junior Formal.

Also, apparently, in the early days (1870's) of MIT, the schedule was very much like high school - classes/labs all day, homework at night, teachers calling on students by name.

P.P.S. Fun fact about "peer institution" Caltech: two instrumental figures in its founding were Hale and Noyes. Noyes had been acting president of MIT before Maclaurin, and left MIT in frustration with its increasing industry ties and increasing neglect of research. Hale had also been involved with MIT, although I don't quite know in what capacity.

Compton Prize Committee

The UA Nominations Board would like to invite you to apply to be an undergrad representative on the prestigious Compton Prize Committee. As an undergrad representative, you will be actively involved in selecting recipients of this Prize.

The Compton Prizes are given in memory of Dr. Karl Taylor Compton, President of the Institute from 1930 to 1949 and Chairman of the Corporation from 1949 to 1954. They are the highest awards presented by the Institute to students and student organizations in recognition of excellent achievements in citizenship and devotion to the welfare of MIT. They reflect outstanding contributions to the MIT community as a whole, sustained over a significant number of years.

Please apply here before 25th of November.